Woo-oo-pee-ee! Obama's election victory proves that the electronic vote-rigging is at an end! But the Democrats' taking the Senate in 2006 had already proved that for all but the conspiracy theorists. And anyone who has taught logic for 30 years knows that the Democrats' rhetoric proves they're not the "party of the rich". Elementary logic! As for myself, I have three words for you and your guests: "You've been had."
Amen atlantabill, amen.Off topic but...Your reference to Bhagat Singh got me interested in the topic. I just finished a book by an Indian anarchist, Maya Ramnath, called "Decolonizing Anarchism." It talks about an Indian exile community in California and their involvement with independence etc. She writes abt Singh too. Anyway, this is a great book for anybody interested in everything to the left of Gandhi and the Left's involvement in the independence movement. A good antidote to the official story, which, as you pointed out, is liberal nonsense.
http://www.latinospost.com/articles/7017/20121117/hacker-group-anonymous-claims-prevent-karl-rove.htm maybe its not that simple, atlantabill!
I have some misgivings about this "Anonymous". This article asks whether "Anonymous" just might be a false-flag operation by the CIA to justify laws shutting down the Internet: http://occupycorporatism.com/recent-attack-on-godaddy-is-false-flag-justifying-need-for-cybersecurity-eo/ And Webster Tarpley (if I recall correctly) thinks that some of the "Anonymous" hackings might be by the Federal Reserve banks themselves to head off competitive strategies by national governments abroad. Although I consider him politically untrustworthy, I think Tarpley has the right take on Wikileaks and the Occupy movement (in which I myself have taken an active part locally). http://tarpley.net/2011/01/20/wikileaks-cognitive-infiltration-operation/ Occupy is fundamentally a top-down phenomenon by an anonymous group behind the scenes. Who knows who the "Anonymous" you see on YouTube and who claims credit for the hacker attacks really represents? The Nov 17 article on Latinos Post you linked to, Super Fun, reflects what faithful agents of the DNC were saying earlier. "Anonymous"'s press release to the website Velvet Revolution, November 8: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/images/Anon_Rove_Letter.pdf You can see CIA asset Thom Hartmann lauding "Anonymous" for this (by definition) black op here: http://samuel-warde.com/2012/11/did-anonymous-block-carl-roves-attempt-to-steal-election/ For how Thom Hartmann co-authored a book published by a CIA front company that took a groundbreaking book (Joan Mellon's A Farewell to Justice) putting forth abundant evidence that the CIA (not the Mafia, as Hartmnn's book claims) was behind the JFK assassination listen to this audio file by Schoenmann and Shone (esp beginning at minute 10:00): http://takingaimradio.com/mp3/takingaim051213.mp3 I'm just giving these as examples: not trying to give a straw-man argument. Hacking the electronic vote-riggers is not a crime since a greater crime justifies a lesser crime used to thwart it, but the "Anonymous" hacking no more evidences a fair Obama victory than the victory itself evidences the death of the vote-rigging or a fair elections process. I don't think Obama's win in Ohio would have been enough by itself to account for the national win, but I'm willing to concede that I might be wrong in this one particular.
Maybe the Dems just stole more votes?From blacklistednews.com, sources embedded in text at link:-22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A ShamAfter what we have seen this November, how is any American ever supposed to trust the integrity of our elections ever again? There were over 70,000 reports of voting problems on election day, and there are numerous eyewitnesses that claim that they saw voting machines change votes for one candidate to another candidate right in front of their eyes. In several of the swing states there were counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the total voting age population by a very wide margin. How in the world does that happen? Some of the vote totals that were reported in some of the most important swing states were completely and totally absurd, and yet we are just supposed to accept them on blind faith without ever being able to ask any questions. Of course the Romney campaign has already totally given up, so it isn’t as if there is any chance that the results of the presidential election could be overturned anyhow. But if massive election fraud did take place and nobody is held accountable, what kind of message will that send for the future? Will we ever be able to have faith in the integrity of our elections ever again?The following are 22 signs that voter fraud is wildly out of control and the election was a sham…#1 According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters across the United States reported more than 70,000 voting problems by 5 PM Eastern time on election day.#2 There were 59 voting divisions in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. In those voting divisions, the combined vote total was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.#3 The overall voter turnout rate in Philadelphia was only about 60 percent. But in the areas of Philadelphia where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter turnout rate was over 90% and Obama received over 99% of the vote. Officials in Philadelphia have already ruled out an investigation.#4 According to WND, one poll watcher in Pennsylvania actually claims that he witnessed voting machine software repeatedly switch votes from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama… It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.” He said that happened in about 5 percent to 10 percent of the votes. He said the changes appeared to have been made by a software program. Ashcroft said the format for computer programming has a default status, and in this case it appeared to be designating a vote for Obama each time it went to default.#5 Somehow Mitt Romney won 55 out of the 67 counties in the state of Pennsylvania and still managed to lose the entire state by a wide margin because of the absurd vote totals that Obama ran up in the urban areas.#6 Barack Obama received more than 98 percent of the vote in 10 out of the 50 wards in the city of Chicago.#7 Prior to the election, voters in the states of Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and Ohio all reported that voting machines were switching their votes for Romney over to Obama.#8 There were more than 50 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Mitt Romney received 2 votes or less.#9 There were more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Barack Obama received more than 99 times the votes that Mitt Romney did.#10 Barack Obama also received more than 99% of the vote in a number of very important precincts down in Broward County, Florida.
#11 Wood County, Ohio (which Obama won) has a voting age population of 98,213, but somehow 106,258 voters were registered to vote on election day.#12 Ten counties in the swing state of Colorado have a voter registration rate of more than 100%.#13 Barack Obama did not win in a single state that absolutely requires a photo I.D. in order to vote.#14 In Ohio, two election judges were caught allowing unregistered voters to cast ballots.#15 Many Ohio voters that showed up at the polls on election day were surprised when they were informed that they had already voted.#16 In fact, there were reports all over the nation of people being unable to vote because records showed that they had already voted.#17 According to U.S. Representative Allen West, there were numerous “voting irregularities” in St. Lucie County, Florida on election day… “The thing that spurred our curiosity in our race was the fact that at 1 o’clock in the morning on Election Night, all of a sudden there was a 4,000-vote swing that took me from being ahead to put the lead into my opponent’s hands.”#18 In Wisconsin, there were allegations that Obama voters were actually being bussed in from out of state… The Democrats stationed a self described “BIG Chicago pro bono attorney” as one of their two observers at this small polling place. He remained at the polling place from 7:00 a.m. until well after 8:p.m. …..A high priced CHICAGO attorney, sitting in a Sheboygan WISCONSIN polling place, observing wards comprised of 1500 voters? …. WHY??? Why would someone from Chicago be observing in Sheboygan Wisconsin? And WHY at such a small polling place? Finally, isn’t it interesting that this would occur at the VERY polling place in which all of the above described events ALSO occurred? AGAIN WHY WOULD A CHICAGO ATTORNEY BE OBSERVING AN ELECTION POLLING PLACE WITH FEWER THAN 1500 VOTERS IN IT, IN SHEBOYGAN WISCONSIN? Of all the places where there has been suspected voting irregularities, and OUTRIGHT FRAUD throughout the ENTIRE United States, WHY HERE? WHY SHEBOYGAN? WHY THIS SMALL WARD? This lawyer spent the day running in and out making, and taking calls, which coincidentally then coincided with influxes of groups of individuals by the van and bus loads, coming in to register, AND VOTE, using what appeared to be copied Allient energy bills. These individuals often did not have photo I.D.’s, could not remember their own addresses without looking at the paper, and became easily tripped, confused and annoyed when questioned. Many of these same individuals, just so happened to be dressed in/wearing CHICAGO BEARS apparel, and whom openly discussed “catching busses back to Chicago” with each other, with poll workers, via their cell phones in the lobby area just outside the polling place, as well as in the parking lot, both before and AFTER registering and voting. One woman was dressed head to toe in CHICAGO BEARS apparel including perfectly manicured BEARS fake fingernails! She complained because registering was taking too long and she had to hurry up to catch her bus back to Chicago. We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from different states, photos of them leaving the polls, and other irregularities.
#19 Prior to election day, an Obama for America staffer was caught on video trying to help someone register to vote in more than one state.#20 It is being alleged that unions in Nevada have been registering illegal immigrants and pressuring them to vote.#21 According to townhall.com, there was a systematic effort by the Obama campaign to suppress the military vote because they knew that most military votes would go against Obama… Aiding Obama’s win was a devious suppression of the conservative vote. The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.#22 According to the Naval Enlisted Reserve Association, it appears that thousands of military votes from this election will never be counted at all.So what do you think about all of this?Do you still believe that elections in America are fair and honest?http://www.blacklistednews.com/22_Signs_That_Voter_Fraud_Is_Wildly_Out_Of_Control_And_The_Election_Was_A_Sham/22570/0/38/38/Y/M.html
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F: